PhilFirst
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
PhilFirst is an active Philippine non-life insurer established in 1906. Its official Marine & Aviation wording covers aircraft physical damage and passenger/cargo-related liability, and its products page now gives a public inquiry path that includes Marine & Aviation Insurance. The public record still lacks the details aviation buyers usually want most: aircraft-type appetite, use-case appetite, pilot criteria, limits, rates, dedicated aviation claims steps and a formal financial strength rating.
Contact
Websitephilfirst.com.ph
Email[email protected]
Phone+63 2 8892 8888
Contact formphilfirst.com.ph
Quote requestphilfirst.com.ph
LinkedInph.linkedin.com
Best for
- Philippines-based aviation or marine buyers seeking a direct non-life insurer inquiry
- Buyers comfortable contacting sales or agent/broker channels for bespoke underwriting
- Users who need high-level aircraft hull and passenger/cargo liability coverage exploration
Potential drawbacks
- No published aircraft-type or use-case appetite
- No dedicated aviation claims workflow found
- No formal financial strength rating found
- No instant aviation quote or aviation application flow found
Coverage and fit
Aircraft segments
Coverage lines
Borrower segments
Not listed.
Usage segments
Not listed.
Research signals
Reputation score
Not scored
Signal strength
low
Sources
15
Public consumer-level discussion is thin, and aviation-specific public sentiment is especially sparse. Official and trade sources emphasize longevity, regulatory standing, financial metrics, new retail products and surety partnerships. Independent signals are mostly a small local directory rating and employee reviews rather than aviation policyholder feedback.
Positive themes
- Long operating history and current Insurance Commission authorization
- Official direct contact, product inquiry and agent/broker-channel indicators
- Trade coverage of new products and digital/surety partnerships
- Sparse employee reviews mention approachable colleagues and a generally pleasant workplace
- A local directory shows a positive third-party rating, but without detailed review text on that page
Negative themes
- No recurring public aviation customer feedback found
- No aviation-specific claims workflow published
- No public aircraft-type/use appetite, pilot criteria, aviation limits or rates found
- No formal financial strength rating found
- Employee reviews include mixed comments about workload, pay and management; these are workplace signals, not customer claims data
Forum themes
- No meaningful aviation-forum, Reddit or pilot-community discussion was found in accessible public search results.
Sources